Please watch this video it’s so important.
im laughing so hard im gonna pass out
T HIS IS REALLY IMPOR TANT HOLY S HIT
What in the hell…
I’m literally ugly crying right now
"That’s not dignified!"
THEY HAVE THE ACE ATTORNEY OFFICIAL MANGA IN MY LAW LIBRARY I AM CRYING.
Your honor, something is amiss here!
As you are probably aware, library materials are labeled with barcodes as well as a number to determine their location on the shelf, as per the Dewey Decimal System. The books just to the left of the manga are labeled, as are the DVDs just in view on the lower shelf. Look even further behind these shelves and you’ll see that even those books are labeled!
Ladies and gentlemen of the courtroom, I invite you to take a closer look at the volumes that are, allegedly, part of this law library! Something is missing from the spines, isn’t there?
Where are the bar codes?!
This is a blatant contradiction! The OP is lying— these volumes cannot, therefore, be a part of this library at all! I propose that they simply brought these materials in for the sake of the joke!!
Only focusing on one aspect and not the whole of the issue, are we, Mr. Wright? Typical.
Your honor, if you bring your attention to the books just left of the manga, you’ll notice there’s a book (the second to the left) that also does not have a bar code.
If you examine the picture even closer—particularly the DVDs below—you’ll see that they bear bar codes, but not on the spines. No, they have them on the back and/or front of the DVDs. Of course, this method of labeling and organizing isn’t limited to products of the film industry alone.
Therefore, I’d like to propose that it is entirely possible that the manga books do, in fact, belong to the library!
Wh-WHAAAAT?! You’re kidding!!
(Shoot, he’s got me there… Better think of something fast! Something about the books that sets them apart from—
…! I’ve got it!)
While that may be true, you’ve also overlooked one critical error: the titles of the books! Whether or not your hypothesis regarding the labeling system is correct, these titles aren’t alphabetized correctly! What kind of self-respecting librarian would misplace such vital books?
While it pains me to have to point out something so obvious, I suppose I’ll make an exception for you, Wright.
Clearly, one look at the titles of the books next to the manga is a tell-all of this certain library’s less-than-stellar organization skills. None of the books are in alphabetical order, I’m afraid.
They could very well be alphabetized by author and not title, but it’s a little difficult to be able to decipher that from this single picture, wouldn’t you say?
Furthermore, the manga books themselves are in numerical order, suggesting some kind of system is in place, albeit not a very good one, if the alphabetizing is off.
At the end of the day, it seems like neither of us can draw a clear conclusion from this evidence alone. Your honor, I strongly suggest a recess in which we could investigate the library itself further.
I see the issue here very clearly.
Due to the uncertain nature of this case, we’ll have to postpone this decision until more decisive evidence can be obtained. The court will now take a 15-minute recess.
(W-wait, but I’m not—)
Hi folks. I really hate to do this but im at a loss at this point.
In laymans terms: i cant afford to live. Please go to the link if you want a more extensive explanation.
I moved to toronto to escape the abuse i was experiencing at home and to acquire safety as a trans…
Going to School
think of all the people who scrolled away
Like what makes you think wearing bindis and war bonnets are okay? Why do white people keep doing stupid shit like that? They must want attention, and we give it to them.
Wearing bindis are fine, I’m Indian and if someone wants to find beauty in my culture, I don’t find anything wrong with that. The bindi itself has a religious background, but it’s usually used as a decorative item in India. They come in a variety of shapes, sizes and colors. It’s not racist.
Fuck no, it’s a goddamned hairstyle. And this is coming from someone with a Jamaican grandmother (not that Jamaica’s even where it originated, but it’s where it was popularized. You get the idea).
Many cultures that would be considered white (Celtic and Roman, among others) had dreadlocks, so to say that it’s cultural appropriation for white people to have them is completely idiotic.
The argument that “white hair doesn’t dread naturally” is utter bullshit, too. All hair dreads naturally. Dreadlocks are literally matted coils of hair. As much as people would like to deny that dreadlocks are matted, as that seems to have connotations with unkempt and dirty hair, that’s exactly what it is. Matted hair.
Absolutely every argument I’ve ever heard against dreads was either navel-gazing, ignorant, hypocritical, racist, or a combination of those things. I’ve known so many blacks that are completely fine with other cultures having dreads because it’s not a sacred thing. It’s a hairstyle to them, just like everyone else.
That’s what gets me about SJWs bitching on cultural appropriation. Literally nobody that’s lived in the real world for more than five minutes gives even the slightest fuck about something as trivial as a hairstyle. If anything, it says more about the SJWs than it does about others.
It’s funny that in their delusional quest for equality, most of their solutions boil down to segregation. And we all know how well that turned out the last time, don’t we?
Let’s play a game.
Type the following words into your tags box, then post the first automatic tag that comes up.